Jaques Cheminade Declares Candidacy for 2012 French Presidential Election

June 19, 2010—On June 18, 1940, Charles de Gaulle launched his historic "Appeal to the French people" from London, calling upon all patriots to resist the occupation of France by the Nazis, as well as the fully complicit Vichy regime of Petain. Against all odds, de Gaulle, at first alone and isolated, went on to organize and lead the Free French forces, admittedly small but ultimately successful.

Now, 70 years later, Jacques Cheminade, president of Solidarite et Progres in France, chose the same date to officially announce his candidacy for the Presidential elections of 2012, in order to rally resistance to the new, financial fascism which threatens worldwide. Although politicians of all stripes have attempted to coopt the 70th anniversary of de Gaulle's famous call, Cheminade is the only one to incarnate the true spirit of resistance.

- * * * -

The "European Cathedral" that Charles de Gaulle, his predecessors and his allies dreamed of building, has become, through the unconscionable compromises of his successors, a disreputable house where banks are bailed out and the people's throats are slit.

I find no one, among my country's official circles, who has risen to the challenge. No one who has offered a vision corresponding to our founding principles and documents, drawn up in the aftermath of the victory of free peoples over regimes that were intent on enslaving and degrading human beings: the preamble of our Constitution and the program of the National Council of Resistance. No one who is leading a ruthless battle against the new feudalism; no one who unstintingly serves the imperative of social justice set out in the Declaration of Philadelphia of May 10, 1944, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. That is because no one dares to stand up to the predatory order of the City of London and Wall Street, by calling by its name this British Empire that intends to destroy the resistance of nation-states.

The two major candidates for the presidency currently promoted by a clique of media cartels, the former surrounded by "a firm," the latter by a "gang," (1), both serve, in their own way, the selfsame interests of a financial oligarchy which is driving the world to disaster, and promoting global austerity which, if not stopped, will lead to a war of all against all. Their policy is that of Chancellor Bruening and Pierre Laval during the 1930s, and we know where that led.

Faced with this tragic failure, faced with the illusion of returning to the past and to the self-destructive blindness of extremisms, I have decided to run for President in 2012 so as to contribute, now, to the needed political wake-up call.

Today, as 70 years ago, France is not alone. A movement is growing in the U.S., within the population, and among certain policymakers — despite the sickening cowardice of the Congress and President Obama — to demand a public productive credit system, to abolish the law of short-term financial gain and restore the priority of productive labor and human creativity. This movement is emerging as a coalition in favor of separating chartered commercial banks from investment banks — i.e., the Glass-Steagall principle adopted under President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, in order to stop destructive forms of financial speculation. This issue is absolutely crucial, and my dear friends across the Atlantic are the spearhead of the motion.

In response to the breakdown of the financial system of Wall Street and the City of London, a mobilization is now building internationally to fend off political and social decomposition.

In this situation, my role, as I see it, is that of a trailblazer striving to give a new sense to the history of our nation by contributing to this great promise emerging worldwide, and to do so in cooperation with all who are guided by the same intention.

The current policy of France is treasonous, and a crime with respect to our own history. It can only lead to chaos.

I therefore call upon all patriots, above party lines and allegiances, to join me in this effort to awaken the great issues of burning inspiration in our country and to unite them with those of others.

For there is a life after the euro and the IMF, provided we rebuild Europe, with such foundations as great projects for development from the Atlantic to the coasts of China, with such pillars as the financial capacities of a New Bretton Woods, and with the rooftop being the political and economic cooperation indispensable for achieving such great infrastructure programs.

This is the Europe that the world needs, whereas the Europe peddled under that name today, is just as dead as the monetary system that begat it.

In order to survive, our society must rediscover political virtue and courage. The opportunity is here and now, amidst the tempest.

(1) the "firm" and the "gang" are the self-proclaimed names of the political teams supporting the candidacies of, respectively, Nicolas Sarkozy and Dominique Strauss-Kahn.

THE IDES OF MARCH. WECAST.

A MUST SEE !!!!

Össur og Stóllinn.

Össur er nú um þessar mundir að sjá að dagar hans eru senn taldir í ríkisstjórn.

Þetta útspil hans er örvæntingartilraun til að sitja áfram að kjötkötlunum í

svonefndri þjóðstjórn. Ríkisstjórnin hefði átt að skila inn umboði sínu eftir

þjóðaratkvæðisgreiðsluna, hún hefur ekki lengur umboð. Hvað þarf til að dólgarnir

skilji sinn vitjunartíma ? Það verður að rjúfa þing og boða til þingkosninga sem fyrst.

Mútuþegarnir á þingi og í stjórnmála elítunni eru alls ófærir að gera nokkurn skapaðann hlut af viti.

"Brennuvargarnir eru verstu slökkviliðsmennirnir"eins og máltækið segir.

Nero er sagður hafa spilað á fiðlu er Róm brann,  vitleysan spilar með Össur meðan Evrópa Brennur.

Ekki til í þjóðstjórn

Obama Failed to Prepare the Most Likely Solution to the Gulf Oil Disaster

June 18, 2010 (LPAC) — Economist and statesman Lyndon LaRouche said today that a critical matter of the BP/Gulf of Mexico oil disaster for which President Obama has to be held to account, is that he has taken no steps to clear the most likely ultimate method of ending the oil gusher — a peaceful nuclear explosion (PNE).

LaRouche charged that the President, despite accumulating evidence, has failed to act on the fact that — since this blowout may actually be a systemic blowout of a whole area of leaks, or a single disastrous blowout greater than hitherto acknowledged — in those cases the United States would have to use a peaceful nuclear explosion to end it.

"The President should have been advised of this, and he should have already gone to other signators of the 1996 Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty," LaRouche said. "We should have gotten the agreement of the parties, in advance, to prepare an exception for this case, in case it may be necessary, with the implication that it may be necessary in other cases as well."

By seeking such agreement in advance, the President would also have been initiating preparations, LaRouche emphasized, since the United States may ultimately have no other way to stop the blowout. But Obama, on this front as on others in the Gulf crisis, has done nothing.

The competence and experience to design and deploy a device appropriate for use in sealing the blown-out BP well exists within the United States national laboratories. The United States' national laboratories have extensive experience with peaceful nuclear explosions, as well as with hundreds of underground nuclear tests carried out through 1992.

Glass-Steagall Resolution Introduced in the Italian Senate

June 18, 2010 (LPAC)—Italian Senator Oskar Peterlini introduced a resolution in the Italian Senate on Thursday, calling on the Italian government to adopt a Glass-Steagall type of separation of commercial banking and investment banking, and in particular to work to establish international agreements based on this principle.

The resolution stresses the fact that speculative financial activity has dried up all of the capital for the productive economy, and that in the past two years, governments have simply bailed out those who have caused the problem. The Cantwell-McCain resolution in the U.S. Senate is also cited.

The resolution concludes by calling on the Italian government:

"to revise Italy's banking laws, in particular as regards the separation between commercial banks and investment banks, for the purpose of guaranteeing that the issue and trading of financial securities, and especially all of those speculative instruments under the name of derivatives (futures, options, swaps, etc.) be completely separate from the ordinary activities (deposits and loans) of commercial banks, de facto restoring the firewall that until the nineteen nineties protected ordinary financial activities from speculative operations;

"to act in all international venues to promote multilateral agreements which establish a return to such a separation of commercial banks and investment banks, thus favoring a climate for long-term investment in the real economy."

The names and affiliations of the other initial signatories are not yet available, nor is it clear when the resolution will be scheduled for debate in the Senate.

In October 2008, Peterlini, a Senator from the autonomous region of Trentino-Alto Adige, introduced a resolution calling for a New Bretton Woods-style reorganization of the international financial system as proposed by Lyndon LaRouche. That led to a three-hour debate in the Senate in February 2009, in which an amended version of Peterlini's resolution was approved, after every political party took a stand on the issue, leading to a broad coalition of forces adding their voices to the call for a bankruptcy reorganization of the global economy.

New Lawsuit Against JPMorgan Over Interest Rate Swaps; Cities Toppling from Swindles

June 18, 2010 (LPAC)—Counties, towns and other government entities—e.g., water, school, and other districts—are now reeling from the economic collapse, and also the effects of all kinds of floating-interest-rate debt, credit default swaps, and other deals foisted on them in recent years by the swarm of brokers and shysters associated with Wall Street and London. Dozens of major cities are bankrupt, though still mostly without official designation, for various legalistic reasons.

Last week, a grand jury in San Diego County issued a report recommending that the city declare bankruptcy. (California uses a grand jury system for civil insolvency as well as criminal cases.) The recommendation came with special attention to San Diego's unfunded pension obligation of $2.2 billion and unfunded retiree liability of $1.3 billion. "Unsustainable" was the grand jury report's opinion.

Hundreds of similar cases exist cross-country. Likewise, there are multiple cases involving unpayable exotic debt deals, and specifically, blood-sucking interest-rate swaps.

This week, a lawsuit was filed against JPMorgan, in the New York Supreme Court in Manhattan, by a former collaborator, Assured Guaranty Ltd., the top municipal bond insurer (by volume) in the United States, over their collapsed partnership in Jefferson County (Birmingham), Alabama. Assured is demanding recompense for its claim that when JPMorgan wrongly induced Jefferson County into debts and swaps on a sewer project, which the County soon couldn't pay, then Assured was wrongly put into a position of having insured the deals through—it claims—JPMorgan's false representations. And now, Assured wants to get out of having to pay default insurance. Suits and countersuits like this are becoming par for the course in dozens of states.

The Jefferson County saga is typical for the nation. Some years back, the County sought funding to pay for a sewer improvement project, and secured fixed-rate bonds. This has been the practice for over 150 years. Then in 2002-2003, JPMorgan came along, and induced (with bribes, an irrelevancy to the main point) the county to changeover to floating-rate bonds. This debt deal was accompanied with some $5 billion worth of interest-rate swaps, sold, like snake-oil, as a way to provide for lower borrowing costs.

The pile of deals fell apart. By January, 2008, Jefferson County faced interest rates of 10%, three times more than it had to begin with. In 2009, JPMorgan paid a $722 million settlement fine to the SEC to end an investigation on how JPMorgan had conducted its sale of bonds and swaps to Jefferson County.

The particulars differ, but the pattern is the same everywhere. In Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, for example, three rounds of interest rate swaps deals were settled on the local government, over the period 2003-2008, associated with a city incinerator project, by JPMorgan and the Bank of Canada.

Make These the 8 Days That Shook the World

June 18, 2010 As Lyndon LaRouche emphasized on Tuesday, "We're looking at a general breakdown crisis, of trans-Atlantic economies, during the period of the end of this month, the latter half of June, and the beginning of July. As of now, such a collapse would seem almost inevitable, first of all, because the circumstances exist, and the conditions are approaching rapidly which will mean that. Therefore, the question of preventing that collapse, by a change of policy, in the United States, in particular, before the end of June, and before the beginning of July, is the most urgent point of concern for anybody in the United States, or, generally, on the planet. Because, once the trans-Atlantic community goes under, once the United States and Europe cave in, and they're on the verge of a breakdown crisis right now. When that happens, and if that happens, then the rest of the world will go soon, and the result will be a plunge of the entire planet into a dark age. So, we're not in a period where we want to talk about September or November, we're talking about NOW....

"But we have to have Obama out, now. Because, as long as he remains, with the prospect of the breakup of the U.S. economy, and the European economies by either some time in June or in July, we can not fool around: We must get Obama out, now, in the way I said we have to get him out. And we have to make certain changes in policy such as immediately going to what? First, Glass-Steagall in the United Unites. It must be put through right now, and I mean the original intent of Glass-Steagall, as U.S. policy. That must be put into effect, immediately."

The decision of the German Constitutional Court yesterday to deny the temporary restraining order against the super-bailout of the Eurozone, underscores the need for the implementation of the Glass-Steagall Act now in the United States, which is necessary, as LaRouche has said, to give Germany and other countries, including Russia, the option of joining a Glass-Steagall type of fixed- exchange-rate system initiated by the United States.

The reorganization of the British banking system also announced yesterday by the new Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne, under the topdown control of the Bank of England, was undoubtedly dictated by the awareness of the British oligarchy of the imminent collapse of the system, and the oligarchy's desire to maintain control of that collapse process.

For us that means that our responsibility to remove Obama from office and to reinstate Glass-Steagall immediately — not after the collapse, but before the collapse, in order to prevent it — must be fully embraced and achieved now.

The potential to remove Obama from office has never been greater.

* On Wednesday, Judicial Watch called for the Office of the Special Counsel to investigate Emanuel and Messina for violation of the Hatch Act, thus backing up the referral by Rep. Issa to the Office of the Special Counsel to that effect on June 8;

* On June 11, Friday of last week, all seven Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee sent a second letter to Eric Holder demanding a special prosecutor in the Sestak and Romanoff cases. The first letter had been sent on May 26, before the White House issued its Sestak memorandum and before Romanoff released the Messina e-mail;

* On June 11, Colorado Senator Michael Bennet admitted publicly that he knew beforehand, from his contact in the Obama Adminstration, that a job offer was going to be made to Romanoff, which makes him an accessory to a crime committed to his benefit. Also, Colorado Governor Bill Ridder admitted on June 14 that he had been in contact with the then chief of personnel in the White House, Donald Gibbs, about obtaining an international job for Romanoff to dissuade him from running against Bennet, whom he had appointed to replace Salazar; and

* On June 15, testimony was presented in the Blagojevich trial in Chicago by Joseph Aramanda, an associate of Tony Rezko, that after picking up a $125,000 kickback check, he was instructed by Rezko to make a $10,000 contribution to Barack Obama's U.S. Senate campaign.

These developments are just the tip of the iceberg and reflect the potential to oust Obama in the immediate period ahead.

The Blagojevich trial in Chicago has all the potential in the world to blow up in Obama's face. On June 6, Lyndon LaRouche had asked: "What has been done with Obama's buddy Rezko, who has been convicted but not sentenced? Is Blagojevich a patsy for the benefit of the President? Why was Rezko never sentenced, or was he sentenced secretly?"

In fact, Rezko is not the only prosecution witness or potential witness who has been convicted but not sentenced. As stressed in a motion filed by Blagojevich in April, there are nine prosecution witnesses who have been convicted, but not sentenced. Blagojevich had asked that their testimony be precluded on the grounds that the government was using the promise and/or hope of freedom as an inducement to obtain testimony by these witnesses, which he said is nothing short of bribery.

As Lyn stressed on Tuesday, the key flank that we have to bring down Obama, who is overripe for a fall, is the exposure of Barney Frank and his role as point man now in the effort to prevent the reinstatement of Glass-Steagall, which was effectively repealed beginning in the 1980s through the treasonous actions of Greenspan, JP Morgan, et al.

We are already in the second half of June. Through the LPAC video operation, the three candidacies of Rachel Brown, Kesha Rogers and Summer Shields, combined with an expanded outreach throughout the country to pass the Glass Steagall resolution, we can and must create a firestorm in this country now to remove Obama from office and reinstate Glass Steagall.

Starting on today, Friday, June 18, we have 8 full organizing days until Lyn's next webcast on June 26.

Make these the 8 days that shook the world!

There Is A Choice--Return to Glass-Steagall!

June 17, 2010 (LPAC)-- The British Empire would desperately like to rewrite the outcome of the historic 1971 debate between Lyndon LaRouche and their toady economist Abba Lerner. You will recall that LaRouche destroyed Lerner by forcing him to explode in public that, if the fascist policies of London's Nazi-banker Hjalmar Schacht had only been adopted willingly by Germany, "Hitler would not have been necessary."

Almost 40 years later, London has deployed one of its current toadies, EU Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, to threaten the nations of Europe — and implicitly the whole world — with the same message: If you don't implement fascist austerity yourselves, we will be forced to implement fascism. You have no choice.

Barroso delivered the threat at a June 11 meeting with trade union leaders from across Europe, as the entire Eurozone banking system is visibly imploding, exactly as Lyndon LaRouche has warned would be the case with a June-July global financial meltdown. According to John Monks, the head of the European Trade Union Confederation, Barroso told them that Spain, Portugal, Greece, and other nations had to go all the way: "Look, if they do not carry out these austerity packages, these countries could virtually disappear in the way that we know them as democracies. They've got no choice; this is it." Monks added that Barroso's "apocalyptic vision" meant that "we're heading back to the 1930s, with the Great Depression and we ended up with militarist dictatorship."

Lyndon LaRouche responded that people uttering this kind of nonsense are either stupid or lying, and in either case, should be excluded from all policy making.

"This is crap. There is a choice. All you have to do is get rid of the phony debt. Cancel it altogether! Then you go back to a standard, regulated banking system, as established under Franklin Roosevelt and his 1933 Glass-Steagall legislation. Just cancel the phony debt, or put it in a place where it can die peacefully. Get rid of financial derivatives. We don't have to pay the debts we don't owe."

And those who are preventing an immediate return to a Glass-Steagall standard today should simply be removed from office — starting with President Obama and Rep. Bailout Barney Frank.

Barney's political days are numbered, now that LPAC-TV will release the real story of how Glass-Steagall was finally revoked in 1999. The operation was first orchestrated by the British out of their JP Morgan financial house, which in 1984 issued an internal pamphlet calling for "Rethinking Glass-Steagall." None other than swindler Alan Greenspan was a JP Morgan director at the time. Greenspan later went on to head the Federal Reserve system from 1987 to 2006, where he oversaw the formal repeal of Glass-Steagall, as well as the general destruction of the U.S. economy.

Today, Bailout Barney has been assigned the task of riding shotgun for London, to try to make sure that Glass-Steagall is never reinstated. But there is a growing clamor across the country for the adoption of Lyndon LaRouche's Glass-Steagall resolution, as spearheaded by the Brown, Rogers, and Shields campaigns.

That increasingly educated mass strike ferment should all be pulled together around Lyndon LaRouche's international webcast 10 days from now, on Saturday, June 26.

Lyndon LaRouche was right about the financial collapse!

BP Clean-up Chaos Engulfs Obama

June 16, 2010 (LPAC)—The so-called oil-spill clean-up of the Gulf Coast conducted by BP and Obama's Unifed Area Command, is a sick pretense, instead of a warfare-scale operation. Every day, this is documented by new scandals, as the Deepwater Horizon oil shows up farther eastward, now proceeding along the Gulf coast of Florida. What's lacking are the skimming systems, oil/water centrifuges, oil pumps, boom and relevant vessels, and manpower—plus a crash program of relevant new technologies (e.g., oil-eating microorganisms), along with mobilizing for maximum spill-handling capacity on the sea at the Macondo well site. This means expropriating BP and getting on with emergency measures.

In fact, there should be pre-positioning of coastal protection now on the Atlantic Coast, for Florida, Georgia and the Carolinas, for the Intercoastal Waterway, in the likely event of the Deepwater Horison spill going into the Loop Current, then into the Gulf Stream. For all the coastlines, including in the Gulf, there should be pre-staging of huge amounts of contingency equipment for when storm currents force oil inland. None of this is being mustered at all.

Of the 17 nations that have offered help, only four of their offers have been accepted. Aid was accepted from Mexico (early May), Norway (early May), The Netherlands (May 23), Canada (June 4).

A defensive press release was issued on this by the State Department ("Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: International Offers of Assistance"), expressing gratitude to the 17 nations, listing them, and then concluding the release with a s**t-eating paragraph, saying that the offers came with the expectation that the USA/BP would pay for the aid. In other words, BP/Obama nixed the aid!

The release text states: "With few exceptions, these international offers of assistance are made on a reimbursable basis, which means that the assistance is provided only if paid for by the recipient..."

Chaos is spreading as localities are forced back onto their own attempts at, "anything that works." On June 12, 200 people rallied against BP at the Alabama Point Bridge, Alabama, on the particular fact that nothing was being done at the Perdido Pass, to diminish entry of oil into the Intracoastal Waterway.

Okaloosa County Defies Obama/BP

Last night, the County Commission of Okaloosa County, Florida (east of Pensacola), voted unanimously to give their emergency management team authority to take whatever action they think best, to prevent oil from entering the Choctawhatchee Bay, through the East Pass. County leaders met in emergency session alongside those of the Destin City Council, in a chamber full of furious residents. Commission Chairman Wayne Harris said, "We made the decision legislatively to break the laws if necessary. We will do whatever it takes to protect our county's waterways and were prepared to go to jail to do it," he told the NWF news service (North West Florida). County action can thus proceed without waiting for approval from the Emergency Operations Center of the state, in Tallahassee, or the Unified Area Command spill center in Mobile.

The NWF yesterday described what the county commission has authorized to be done: "to spend $200,000 to pay for an underwater air curtain designed to push oil up where it can be collected and $16,500 a day to operate and maintain it.

"He [the county's Public Safety Director Dino Villani] has authority to, without a nod from the U.S. Coast Guard, deploy barges, weighted so that they'll sit low in the water across the entrance to the pass.

"He is also authorized to look into a slip curtain, another underwater oil-catching device."

Some of the enraged onlookers wanted to authorize filling in the pass completely, to shut it down, but this was rejected as a bad idea.

Placquemines Parish's Nungesser: 'We're Using Wetvacs"!

Billy Nungesser, President of Placquemines Parish, Louisiana, ridiculed the wait-and-stall mode of BP/Unified Command, by saying that his people went out and bought WetVacs (the ShopVac-brand heavy-duty vacuum cleaners, for fluid refuse). They put them on boats; they suck up oil fine. Why can't the government do something! Nungesser told Congress last week, that Port-a-Potty vaccuum machines also work fine. He said on CNN last night, that BP has agreed to pay for 32 WetVacs. Where is the government? How can you call this a clean-up?

Eurosystem Heading Toward July 1 Liquidity Shock

June 16, 2010 (LPAC)—The mechanics of the euro system are grinding to a halt. The sovereign debt crisis is pushing liquidity to places considered "safe." Every night, banks of the eurozone deposit ever more funds at the ECB, even though the yield they get is only a miniscule 0.25 percent, because they do not trust the solvency of any of the other private banks enough to lend to them. On Monday morning, 384 billion euros were on deposit at the ECB — an astonishing figure, since this was only a few billion euros per day before the 2008 financial crisis. The current volume is even far higher than the volume deposited the week after the Lehman default.

At the same time, interbank lending is frozen. Saving banks are refusing to lend to commercial banks. Since May, writes Le Figaro, lending from European banks has simply stopped.

On top of that, in two weeks, on July 1st, European banks will have to repay the 442 billion euros they borrowed from the ECB's exceptional financing facility, opened up for them one year ago. The date of July 1 to exit the facility is a real subject of preoccupation for European banks, says Alain David, the executive financial director of French bank Banque Populaires-Caisses d'Epargne (BPCE).

European Banks have been putting money aside to pay back what they borrowed, but not all are ready to pay now. Spanish banks such as Sabadell and Banesto have only 35 percent of what's required, and Germany's Commerzbank only 32 percent. According to Morgan Stanley, European banks have found 250 billion thus far, and still need another 150. But July 1st is not the only major deadline for the banks. Before the end of the year, banks need to repay at least 560 billion euros, and with the imposition of the new Basel III accounting rules, that amount will increase to 1,500 billion euros.

The President Shows He's a Liar--For the Queen

June 15, 2010 (LPAC)—President Obama's consistent lying on the case of BP's criminality in the Gulf, is nothing less than his service to his friend, the British Queen. At this point, it's not worth blaming BP; they're a known criminal entity. The blame belongs with the Queen, who heads the imperial enterprise of which BP is a part, and with the Queen's puppet, Barack Obama, stated Lyndon LaRouche today.

There will be no solution until Obama is removed from his current position.

Two elements of the President's lying behavior, exposed in an article called "The Spill, The Scandal, and the President" in the latest issue of Rolling Stone magazine, illustrate the case.

* First, there's the NOAA Story. As shown in a picture of a NOAA White Board in the NOAA "war room" in Seattle, Washington April 22, two days after the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's best scientific estimate at that time was that the spill would be spewing 64,000 to 110,000 barrels per day. Yet, the Obama Administration succeeded in suppressing these figures, in favor of BP's own absurd declarations that 1,000 bpd, and then 5,000 bpd were spewing from the well. Only now, is the figure inching up toward the lower limit of the NOAA projection—to 55,000 bpd—when the cover-up is no longer possible.

* Second, there's the cover-up for BP, evident in the so-called Oil Spill Response Plan which is submitted prior to getting its license for the Deepwater Horizon facility, in April of 2009 (note—Obama was in office). This Plan was not simply a lie about BP's capabilities of handling a crisis, as we've exposed before; it's literally a joke. The 582-page "plan" includes provisions for protecting walruses, sea otters and sea lions! The Obama Administration obviously didn't even read it.

How many more lies is this President going to be allowed to get away with?