New York Times is Voice for British Genocide Policy in Haiti

March 29, 2010 (LPAC)—Three days before the March 31 general conference of "donors" for catastrophe-struck Haiti, the Sunday New York Times, in its lead editorial, tried to pre-empt the decision of that conference on behalf of British imperial genocide policy against Haiti's people. The editorial, "Making Haiti Whole," no doubt reflected White House decisions for the donors' conference policy.

"The plans to be presented this week," announced the Times imperially, will be "ideas like these." The first idea, "Transparency, accountability, effectiveness," means to the Times and no doubt to Obama's White House that aid should go through "a multi-donor trust run by the World Bank." The second idea, "Haitian involvement," does NOT involve the Haitian government — an "interim recovery authority" would be a committee of NGOs and similar groups, at arms' length from the Haitian government, which might, in a few years if the government is very good, start to report to Haiti's Prime Minister. And the idea of "self-sufficiency" means, in this British intention, "modest investments in the garment industry," repeating disastrous experiments with globalization which have destroyed Haiti.

Without immediate relocation of the Haitian capital's gravely endangered population to newly built areas with newly built infrastructure away from Port-au-Prince, mass death threatens, as Lyndon LaRouche alone has had to courage to warn publicly, and repeatedly.

"Maybe," LaRouche said today about the Times editorial, "they should fire all the literate reporters on the Times — it could be a way to improve the paper, on the cheap.

LaRouche Webcast: June 27, 2009