Bankrupt Britain Is On List with Spain, Greece, and Portugal

February 8, 2010 (LPAC)—"Put the UK on the list" of coming sovereign debt downgrades and defaults, said former IMF chief economist Simon Johnson in a BBC interview on Sunday. As it was reported that Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS, now essentially nationalized by bailouts) would report a 2009 loss of over $10 billion this week, Johnson added the simple but essential point: The European countries on "that list" are facing sovereign debt crisis and default because of the huge layouts they made in ultimately futile actions to bail out their big international banks. That insane policy was driven by British officials through the February 2009 "G-20" conference where President Barack Obama backed the British; and now, it is dooming the British and other in "Euroland" who followed it.

Johnson said financial markets have changed dramatically in the past two months and are again very nervous, with default spreads widening over sovereign debt. "Now, Greece is an extreme example — there I think you can see that it's going to get very messy, very quickly — but ... I have to add the UK to this list," he said. He added that the so-called "G-7" Finance Ministers meeting in Canada this weekend "show[ed] no awareness at all that much of Europe is facing a serious crisis and it's not limited to Spain, Greece and Portugal.... There's a very serious crisis inside the Eurozone."

Financial press in the United States and Europe are full of forecasts of more down, down for the Euro in coming weeks.

In a notable development reported by the Guardian, the British Crown/Spanish financial conglomerate Banco Santander UK may be getting another large "transfer" of British banking assets from RBS, arranged by the Bank of England. The BoE has "ordered" RBS to sell off about 300 bank branches of its Williams & Glyns bank subsidiary in the UK. Santander is likely to add that to the British banking pieces it has already been fed: Abbey Banks, Bradford & Bingley mortgage bank, and Alliance & Leicester banks. This would give it a 10% share of UK business lending as well as 11% of mortgage lending.

This means Santander, already facing big losses on its Spanish "assets," will go down the tubes with British debt in 2010.

http://www.larouchepac.com/node/13478

Educate your self on how the British Stole the GOLD STOCK OF USA in FORTH KNOX !

Google Video The Money Masters - Part 1 of 2

We Are A Republic, Not A Democracy

 

 

Today Has A History

 

The essential evil of the present British Royal regime’s imperial system of government, can be traced in modern history, to deep roots in a time as early as that of the process of degeneracy of King Henry VIII (b.1491- d.1547), a decadence which was orchestrated by that King’s then newly arrived (A.D. 1529) sex-councillor, the Venetian intelligence authority Francesco Zorzi (aka Giorgi) (b. 1466-d. 1540). In some respects, it is necessary to trace matters in such attention to details of the implicit cultural (Leibnizian) dynamics overlapping personal life-times, if one is to locate the background of necessary reference for understanding England’s key role in process of modern European history from a time about A.D.1529, through the February 1763 Peace of Paris, and, the subsequent, Eighteenth-century British imperialist tradition.

That modern, A.D. 1529-1763, process, leading into the formal birth of modern British imperialism, has been the historical backdrop which must be adopted as the reference needed to situate the origins of that system of Paolo Sarpi (b.1552-d.1623) which became known by such names as “behaviorism.” This is a system which was based upon the prevalent, categorical rejection of any principled standard of truthfulness, as this rejection was argued most plainly by Adam Smith in his 1759 Theory of the Moral Sentiments, as what is to be recognized, most easily, as the specifically British monetarist cultural tradition, to the present day.¹ The result has been, that the reigning body of so-called Liberal “popular opinion” in much of the world today, is, more often than not, a system of the sophistry imposed as a blending of induced popular stupidities and accompanying official lies.²

Thus, we have Adam Smith’s predecessor John Locke’s (b. 1632-d. 1704) system of thought, a system which is still praised as “democracy” by fools or swindlers, alike, including the British promotion of the alleged right to capture and hold African captives in perpetual slavery of successive generations inside the United State. Just so, had President Barack Obama and his behaviorist retinue inserted into the Senate’s so-called “health-care” bill the decree, the perpetual right of those evil insurance companies associated with AIG, to secure the future privilege of murdering more Americans henceforth, than those who had been killed in 1939-1945 Europe, killed by those guilty parties who were hauled before a post-1945 Nuremberg Trials for crimes against humanity for crimes of a type identical with those for which Nazi doctors were condemned and executed at Nuremberg.

Now come Obama’s proposed, so-called health-care reforms, which, if established, would murder a vastly greater percentile of the U.S. population, than Hitler had killed by similar health-care polices, back then.

Today, we need the likeness of President Abraham Lincoln’s victory over the British empire’s backers of the practice of slavery, as we did then, as, in certain respects, still today.³ This means, over the time of today’s system of predatory, followers of the “health care” of Hitler’s and Tony Blair’s practices, including a Blair legacy for which Obama had been chosen to attempt to push through in the guise of what private health-care insurers have been chosen to install today.

MORE:

http://www.larouchepac.com/node/13465

Save the People of Iceland:  http://savethepeopleoficeland.com/  

# 4,044: 7:50 pm PST, Feb 8, Glimpse Theunthinkable, Michigan
Just no that many of us here in the united states don't feel anyone should pay a debt that isn't one that rightly has to be payed & if it comes to it we are prepared to lay down lives to save iceland both from this and being part of any union that promotes enslavement, our country and yours might want to look at options of cleaning the slate if you will, because we as a people have entered an age where money WILL NOT LET US PROSPER ANYMORE! and there are those of us who are prepared to arm & fight along side icelanders if the time calls. Any force who so wishes to take up power en control over iceland know u will have the necessary means of defense of your great country! pass this along to those you trust if you care to take one mans "word"!!

# 4,041: 6:21 pm PST, Feb 8, Trevor Rouillard, Canada
We do not want private banks. The people of this planet will not comply with debt slavery any longer.

# 4,036: 3:52 pm PST, Feb 8, Rick McBride, Wyoming
We are behind you, Birgitta Jonsdottir and the People of Iceland. Stand firm and tall! If you can prosecute the gangster banksters then perhaps the rest of the world will do the same.

# 4,012: 12:23 am PST, Feb 8, Cameron Roy, Ohio
We are all behind you on this. Iceland is the front line in the battle against the criminal bankers trying to collapse the economies of the world. If you can beat these criminals, then surely the U.S. can as well.

We are at War and the Enemy is the British Empire

January 29, 2010 (LPAC)—As we approach Lyndon LaRouche's international webcast tomorrow, Saturday, January 30, 2010, the mass strike in the U.S. whose leadership is Lyndon LaRouche, is zeroing in on the center of British monetarism in the U.S.—Wall Street and the Federal Reserve system. Even the "go along to get along"-controlled U.S. Senate was driven by this mass strike to cast 30 votes against the reconfirmation of "Bailout" Ben Bernanke, the most votes ever cast against a nominee for chairman of the British-controlled Federal Reserve.

While Bernanke was reconfirmed yesterday, the drive to nail both Geithner and Bernanke is now escalating. As Lyndon LaRouche said today, "It's not going to go away. This is the end of some people, the end of some people's careers."

In the case of Geithner, he could be facing perjury charges. During sworn testimony before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Thursday, he admitted that he did not sign an agreement recusing himself from the AIG matter. Nonetheless, he claimed: "I withdrew from day-to-day management, operations, policies of the New York Fed, and my colleagues both in Washington and in New York can attest to that." Unfortunately for Geithner, Neil Barofsky, Special Inspector General of TARP, who also testified at the hearing, contradicted Geithner on this matter, and reported that FRBNY executives have stated to his office that they met with Geithner on the AIG credit default swaps deal, and that Geithner "acquiesced" to their proposal to pay the AIG credit default swaps at 100%. When asked by Barofsky's office if the executives felt they had received their "marching orders" from Geithner to pay the counterparties par, one FRBNY official responded, "Yes, absolutely."

On Monday, the ranking members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, led by Rep. Issa, released a 22-page report entitled: "How the Federal Reserve Fought to Cover up the Details of the AIG Counterparties Bailout from the American People." The report releases a number of e-mails from FRBNY officials which prove that Geithner was deeply involved in the policy decision. His meeting log also shows that he conducted six formal meetings on AIG in November 2008 with staff.

But it is not only Geithner who is in trouble. On Tuesday, Rep. Issa sent a letter to Committee Chair Edolphus Towns urging him to issue a new subpoena in the AIG case, this time to the Federal Reserve. Issa points out that new information has come to light about documents in the possession of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors regarding the Federal Reserve's decision to bail out AIG in September of 2008. Issa points out that his office has received important information from a whistleblower who has identified specific documents which detail Bernanke's personal involvement in the decision to pay AIG credit default swaps at 100%.

So even as Bernanke was reconfirmed as Fed Chair, he is about as secure in his office as Nixon was after the 1972 elections.

After the hearings on Wednesday, Rep. Issa released a statement in which he said of Geithner: "If he or anyone else thinks that this investigation will stop after today's hearing, they are completely mistaken."

Issa also released a 5-page document, the "Schedule A" which AIG filed with the SEC, detailing all of the credit default swaps paid by AIG to Goldman Sachs, etc. The FRBNY had tried to prevent this information from being filed. When it was finally filed, the SEC was supposed to seal it until the year 2018 and keep it in a location designated for national security items. But now it has been released publicly in unredacted form.

Rosa Luxemburg and LaRouche's Triple Curve.

At the same time, there are increasing indications, as Lyndon LaRouche said today, that some people who want to stay in public life, recognize that this is the obvious time to jump ship. Democrats are jumping ship to get on the Republican payroll.

A case in point is a deal struck on Wednesday between the Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Cal) and Rep. Michael Burgess (R-Tx.) to launch an investigation of the corrupt deal made by the Obama White House with the pharmaceutical companies, the hospitals, and the doctors, at the point that the drive for Obama deathcare was being launched. Waxman, one of three House committee chairmen responsible for shepherding the House version of Obama deathcare through the House, agreed to help Republicans get a comprehensive list of meetings the White House held with industry representatives, as well as records documenting calls and emails between outside groups and the Department of Health and Human Services.

Meanwhile, as Lyndon LaRouche has emphasized, Britain's puppet in the White House, Obama himself, is nearing the end of his Neronic career. Instead of listening to the mass strike process, in his State of the Union speech Obama proved himself, as LaRouche has stated, constitutionally in incapable of change. He insisted, instead, upon continuing to push his Nazi death bill and fascist "green energy" policy.

Even the Wall Street Journal lead editorial caught the flavor of Obama's tendency toward political suicide, comparing Obama to Willy Loman in Arthur Miller's Death of a Salesman. As the Journal wrote: "On health care, Mr. Obama offered a Willy Loman-esque soliloquy on his year-long effort, as if his bill's underlying virtues and his own hard work haven't been truly appreciated by the American public."

As the suppression of the article by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard exposing the intention of the British Empire to eliminate national sovereignty, demonstrates, the war we are engaged in is for the sovereign capacity of nation states, acting in concert to develop their respective peoples against a monetarist British Empire intent upon killing those same people. Evans-Pritchard compares the British-controlled EU beauracracy to the ultramontane medieval papacy with its jesuitical lawyers. It was against this ultramontane imperialist system that Nicolaus Cusa in 1433 wrote that the emperor "derives his power from the people." This is the principle which the British Empire and their puppet Obama are denying at their own peril.

As LaRouche has emphasized, the mass strike currently under way in the U.S., as reflected in the Massachusetts election, reflects precisely this principle, embedded in the U.S. Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution.

It is this principle which is now defining politics in the U.S. and, by extension, throughout the world. The population is ready to fight. The only problem is, that it doesn't know the solution. Lyndon LaRouche does.

http://www.larouchepac.com

The Brutish Empire Wants to Take Your Sovereignty Away

January 25, 2010 (LPAC)-- On Jan. 17, the London Daily Telegraph's star economics columnist Ambrose Evans Pritchard reported on current British imperial strategy for the world in the starkest terms: the final elimination of all national sovereignty. Pritchard, commenting on a European Central Bank draft document which rewrites the Europe Union treaty, reported that they are proposing "a new 'legal order' that transcends a 'largely obsolete concept of sovereignty' and imposes a 'permanent limitation' on the states' rights." Pritchard added that EU nations will be instructed to destroy their economies, and "if they fail to marshal public support for draconian austerity, they risk being cast into Icelandic oblivion."

Shortly after it appeared, the Daily Telegraph suppressed the Evans Pritchard article, pulling it from its web site altogether. What is involved is not some minor, journalistic scandal.

"People were scared enough to force an Evans Pritchard piece to be suppressed, after it appeared," Lyndon LaRouche stated today. "Evans Pritchard says the British policy is one of imperialism—no national sovereignty. He said there is no sovereignty of nations anymore. And what he said is the truth, and that's the issue they don't want discussed. So therefore, in that case, don't be naïve, don't play by the so-called rules. Recognize what they are afraid of, and give them their worst nightmare.

"They don't want to talk about this article?" LaRouche continued. "Well, we want to talk about this article. Why did you guys suppress this article? What wrong with it? He's right. There is no sovereignty left in Europe. And that is exactly what they intend for the United States as well, and for the rest of the world."

More: http://www.larouchepac.com/node/13259

FULL ARTICLE SUPPRESSED BY THE TELEGRAPH:

By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
The Telegraph, London
Sunday, January 17, 2010

http://www.gata.org/node/8246

 

SUPPRESSED ARTICLE ON TELEGRAPH LINK:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/7012297/ECB-prepares-legal-ground-for-euro-rupture-as-Greek-crisis-escalates.html

 

DOWNLOAD VIDEO LINK:

http://www.larouchepac.com/webcasts/20100130.html

The Money Masters are Enslaving Iceland.

Save the People of Iceland - the Official Petition

We the undersigned support the people of Iceland in their uprising against being bullied into taking on more debt then they can possible handle from the private bank Icesave. Private debt should never be passed on to taxpayers. 

You are an inspiration to the rest of the world:   http://savethepeopleoficeland.com/ 

 

EDUCATE YOUR SELF. EXTREMELY IMPORTANT!

AVAILABLE FULL LENGTH AT GOOGLE VIDEO.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-515319560256183936&hl=en

THE MONEY MASTERS.

Dear fellow Icelanders, please do not sign the petition, it is for people who are not from Iceland to support us.

Iceland may be the first Western democracy to be forced into South-American style debt-slavery. The IMF, in concert with the UK and the Netherlands, has attempted to strongarm the recently impoverished Island of 317,000 into paying over 3.6 billion pounds ($6.3bn) -- $86,000 per Icelandic family -- at 5.5% interest for the next generation. The money is not conventional government debt, but arises from the collapse of a private multi-national bank during the financial crisis.

The issue is so serious that the entire nation will vote on the issue towards the end of February 2010.

On December 30, 2009, after extraordinary diplomatic threats, Iceland's parliament passed narrowly a bill agreeing to pay the onerous terms. Only a few months earlier parliament had agreed to the full amount, but under more reasonable conditions.

The people of Iceland must be internationally supported, so they can feel safe in voting down debt-slavery. If Iceland falls, it won't be long before other countries suffer similar financial extortion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icesave_dispute

 ON website: http://savethepeopleoficeland.com/ 

# 4,012: 12:23 am PST, Feb 8, Cameron Roy, Ohio
We are all behind you on this. Iceland is the front line in the battle against the criminal bankers trying to collapse the economies of the world. If you can beat these criminals, then surely the U.S. can as well.

# 3,954: 10:05 pm PST, Feb 6, Natalia Jaworska, Poland
Iceland is such a great, brave country! We love you here in Poland! It took small country of so few citizens to tell hook nosed gangsters to take a hike. Never change! Be proud and keep your heads up! You are the World's precious gift of hope and courage. My country and my fellow citizens are being raped and looted now . England and USA shame on you for participating and hosting this international long nosed criminals. JUSTICE WILL BE SERVED!

# 3,448: 12:50 pm PST, Jan 26, Margarita Borodina, Russian Federation
My vote for Icelanders. You are not alone.
 
# 3,446: 12:12 pm PST, Jan 26, Voreinaki Elen, Greece
we know who is the enemy ......fight and resistance....is the solution...support the Iceland people..

# 3,444: 11:48 am PST, Jan 26, Catherine Henderson, United Kingdom
No individual, organisation, or country, was obliged to invest. They freely chose to take this step, speculating on high returns. It is utterly illogical - not to mention immoral - that those who chose to speculate should complain about that risk: would they have shared part or all of their gains with Iceland if matters had turned out differently? As an ordinary British subject, I am ashamed at the disgraceful actions of our government, in attempting to force Iceland to pay for debts for which they have no responsibility.
 
# 3,443: 11:44 am PST, Jan 26, Linus Rydberg, Sweden
Keep fighting the banksters! we are all behind you.

# 3,442: 11:43 am PST, Jan 26, Tim Soanes, United Kingdom
Stop co-operating with the sick system!

# 3,441: 11:34 am PST, Jan 26, Ulrik Bergsland, Sweden
I believe this is a huge problem, and something should be done to save the Icelandic population.

# 3.423: 9:13 am PST, Jan 26, James Dodwell, United Kingdom
You have my support and that of a lot of people. Fight for your constitutional rights and prove to the rest of the World that nations can be free of this fiat money monster. Read 'The Globalization of Poverty' by Michel Chossudovsky for an account of how they have systematically forced nation after nation under their control through loans.

# 3,401: 5:20 am PST, Jan 26, Galina Gusseva, Belarus
We support Iceland

I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks, will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. -- Thomas Jefferson

BRAVE ICELAND!

by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.

January 7, 2010

It goes virtually without saying, that I am proud of Iceland and its President.

Iceland President Stands by His People

January 8, 2010 (LPAC)-- Despite the hostility of the governments of Great Britain and the Netherlands, which have threatened to kick Iceland out of the "international community," Iceland President Olaf Ragnar Grimsson is standing by his decision, and defending, in interviews and statements, the right of his people to national sovereignty. In the Financial Times today, he is quoted as saying, "The Icelandic constitution is based on the fundamental principle that the people have sovereignty. It is the responsibility of the President to make sure that the will of the people will prevail."

He then called on the peoples of Britain and Netherlands ("and their political leaders") to stand "with the longstanding democratic traditions of Britain and the Netherlands, acknowledging that a referendum is a democratic way of making a decision,"

Grimsson was also interviewed in Swedish radio.

In an interview with BBC on Wednesday evening, Grimsson was verbally assaulted by the host, who looked like an attorney for Shylock and treated the President of a state like a felon. "Don't trust an Icelander," "Aren't international agreements more important than a President's will?" and "Are you happy with these results?" (downrating, loss of international credit, etc.) were the interviewer's questions and remarks. Grimsson taught the arrogant fellow a lesson, telling him, "I understand that Britain is not familiar with systems where the people is called to express its will " and that in Iceland, "not the parliament, but the nation is sovereign."

In contrast to the oligarchy, the British people continue to express their sympathy for Icelanders, at least judging from readers' comments continuing to flow in to major dailies (see below). It is probably due to this that a faction of the British establishment, represented by the Financial Times, has taken a distance from the government and openly rejected the "hard-line" approach towards Iceland. Significantly, an FT editorial today is entitled "Do Not Put Iceland in a Debtors' Prison." The FT also chose to publish a letter by Advocacy International, saying that it is "unjust" to make Iceland take sole responsibility for the "reckless behavior of private bankers and risk-takers."

The FT ran as a blowup quote, the view of its chief financial commentator, Martin Wolf: "This is not about cutting a running deficit, which is, indeed, unavoidable. It is about forcing innocent people to assume gigantic liabilities for which they have no legal or moral responsibility. How would U.K. citizens feel if they were forced to assume a debt of ￡400 billion because of HSBC's failure to meet deposit insurance liabilities in Asia? Let the U.K. take the bank's assets and leave it at that."

Also, Michael Hudson from the University of Missouri writes that "Iceland has the right to refuse debt servitude." Hudson argue that Iceland could pay foreign debt only out of balance-of-payments receipts, i.e. through export revenues. But already fish export revenues have been entirely earmarked to service existing debt; the same goes for aluminum exports and its geothermal and hydroelectric resources. Add to this the fact that most families have mortgages which, if the currency is depreciated, can only get worse, and you have the picture: It is impossible for Iceland to pay the debt. "A pragmatic economic principle is at work in such conditions. Debts that cannot be paid, will not." If we have learned the lessons of the collapse of living standards in post-Soviet Russia, he ends by asking, "by how many years must Icelandic lifespans shorten?"

According to a European banking source, the British and the Dutch are going to dump the burden on Scandinavian countries. On their side, the resistance organization in Iceland is calling on the Scandinavian governments to support them against the London and The Hague.

http://www.larouchepac.com/node/13060

THE SWINDLERS LIST: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohKKiZQEL-U

To The People Of Iceland - Say NO! To Icesave

French Deputy Calls For Parliamentary Investigation Into Swine Flu Vaccination "Fiasco"

French Deputy Jean-Marie Le Guen, a doctor and the health specialist for the PS Socialist Party, called on Sunday for a parliamentary inquiry into the "fiasco" of the swine flu vaccination campaign and "vaccination politics," according to Le Parisien.

The demand comes among growing criticism of the French government's handling of the swine flu vaccination campaign.

Professor Bernard Debré, UMP deputy, said that the "pincriple of precuation has been pushed to extreme stupidity" during the campaign.

He estimated that France had bought 50 to 70 million swine flu jabs too many as well as a third of world's reserves of Tamiflu, and the total cost of the swine flu campaign could come to 2 billion euros.

Professor Marc Gentilini, specialist for infectious diseases and former president of the Red Cross criticised the way the government had not been willing to enter into a real "dialogue" about the low risk of the swine flu virus.

http://www.theflucase.com

European Parliament to Investigate WHO and “Pandemic” Scandal

European Parliament to Investigate WHO and “Pandemic” Scandal
By F. William Engdahl for Global Research.

The Council of Europe member states will launch an inquiry in January 2010 on the influence of the pharmaceutical companies on the global swine flu campaign, focusing especially on extent of the pharma‘s industry’s influence on WHO. The Health Committee of the EU Parliament has unanimously passed a resolution calling for the inquiry. The step is a long-overdue move to public transparency of a “Golden Triangle” of drug corruption between WHO, the pharma industry and academic scientists that has permanently damaged the lives of millions and even caused death.
The parliament motion was introduced by Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, former SPD Member of the German Bundestag and now Chairman of the European Parliament Health Committee. Wodarg is a medical doctor and epidemiologist, a specialist in lung disease and environmental medicine, who considers the current “pandemic” Swine Flu campaign of the WHO to be “one of the greatest medicine scandals of the Century."
The text of the resolution just passed by a sufficient number in the Council of Europe Parliament says among other things, “In order to promote their patented drugs and vaccines against flu, pharmaceutical companies influenced scientists and official agencies, responsible for public health standards to alarm governments worldwide and make them squander tight health resources for inefficient vaccine strategies and needlessly expose millions of healthy people to the risk of an unknown amount of side-effects of insufficiently tested vaccines. The "bird-flu"-campaign (2005/06) combined with the "swine-flu"-campaign seem to have caused a great deal of damage not only to some vaccinated patients and to public health-budgets, but to the credibility and accountability of important international health-agencies.”
The Parliamentary inquiry will look into the issue of „falsified pandemic“ that was declared by WHO in June 2009 on the advice of its group of academic experts, SAGE, many of whose members have been documented to have intense financial ties to the same pharmaceutical giants such as GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Novartis, who benefit from the production of drugs and untested H1N1 vaccines. They will investigate the influence of the pharma industry in creation of a worldwide campaign against the so-called H5N1 “Avian Flu”  and H1N1 Swine Flu. The inquiry will be given “urgent” priority in the general assembly of the parliament.
In his official statement to the Committee, Wodarg criticized the influence of the pharma industry on scientists and officials of WHO, stating that it has led to the situation where “unnecessarily millions of healthy people are exposed to the risk of poorly tested vaccines,” and that, for a flu strain that is “vastly less harmful” than all previous flu epidemics.
Wodarg says the role of the WHO and its the pandemic emergency declaration in June needs to be the special focus of the European Parliamentary inquiry. For the first time, the WHO criteria for a pandemic was changed in April 2009 as the first Mexico cases were reported, to make not the actual risk of a disease but the number of cases of the disease basis to declare “Pandemic.” By classifying the swine flu as pandemic, nations were compelled to implement pandemic plans and also the purchase swine flu vaccines. Because WHO is not subject to any parliamentary control, Wodarg argues it is necessary for governments to insist on accountability. The inquiry will also to look at the role of the two critical agencies in Germany issuing guidelines on the pandemic, the Paul-Ehrlich and the Robert-Koch Institute.

Sources:
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16667
http://www.wodarg.de/english/2948146.html

To What Are You Loyal?

by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.

December 31, 2009

With the crafting of the Hitler-like “IMAB” conditionality in the Senate health-care bill, President Barack Obama’s faction within the Democratic Party has gone over, not only, to the side of the enemies of our Federal Constitution’s most fundamental principle, but, by lending aid to such implicitly treasonous action, has given support to that which is fairly described as the principle of Satanic evil expressed in the usurpatious, and, frankly pro-satanic policies of Britain’s former Prime Minister Tony Blair who has led in reviving Adolf Hitler’s war-time health-care policies, with the active prompting of him by the leading figures of the present British royal house.

Under these conditions, when our republic is under a presently existential threat to its continued moral, and also its physical existence as a free republic, our patriots must make a principled break with the presently incumbent British monarchy. Patriotic Democrats, in or out of the Federal Congress, will prove themselves patriots by breaking themselves free of the control recently exerted by that corrupted administration and its leading accomplices within the Presidency and the Congress.

They, for the very soul’s sake, must join with other patriots in summarily ridding this nation of that evil which is represented by those who have acted to support the frankly Satanic evil which the President has come to represent through policies of practice such as the present, implicitly pro-Satanic, version of the draft health-care legislation introduced under the present Senate leader.

By his actions in this matter, especially those offenses represented by his so-called “health-care reforms,” this President and those elements of his Administration and Party which have crafted the hideous, Hitler-like policies represented by the content of the present Senate draft of that bill, have made themselves complicit, whether wittingly or not, with a policy which is tantamount to that of the Nuremberg crimes traced to Hitler’s health-care measures introduced as those "Nazi Tiergarten 4" health-care policy under the war-time Nazi law which led to the great genocide for which leading physicians and others were condemned to death in the so-called “Nuremberg” proceedings.

We must join with those nations of the world which had led in defeating the evil scheme which the present British imperial monarchy had brought to the recent Copenhagen “summit.” We must align ourselves with those nations which share the principle which was defended against the evil, long associated with her consort, the Duke of Edinburgh, the which Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, had assigned to that Copenhagen “summit,” the Duke’s intention to reduce a world population of a currently estimated 6.7 billions living human souls, to two or less, that at a rapid rate.

We would hope that our sane and honorable “cousins” within the population of the United Kingdom would lend support to what should be, morally, our common cause against the monstrously great evil which the recent Senate action in support of President Obama’s and former Prime Minister Tony Blair’s evil scheme represents as a currently immediate, implicitly pro-Satanic, Hitler-like, threat to all humanity.

Only Four Powers Cooperation Can Avoid Middle East Trigger for WWIII

December 29, 2009 (LPAC)—There is a growing, imminent danger that Israel, under British pressure, will launch a preemptive attack against Iran, ostensibly to prevent the Islamic Republic from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Were such an attack to occur, Lyndon LaRouche warned today, it would be a virtual trigger for World War III, particularly if Israel resorted to the use of nuclear weapons in the attack. LaRouche assessed that the prospect of such an Israeli attack has greatly increased, as the result of growing desperation in London, as the result of the British Monarchy's abject failure to impose their policy of global depopulation at the recently-concluded Copenhagen conference on global warming. Inside Iran, sources closely tracking events there warn, an Israel attack would provide the most radical factions of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corp (IRGC) with the pretext to carry out a "Night of the Long-Knives" extermination of the leadership of the opposition. The assassination on Dec. 27 of Ali Mousavi, the nephew of the former Presidential candidate and Speaker of the Parliament Hussein Mousavi, was a premeditated operation, carried out by IRGC-controlled assassination teams from the Basij militia, and was indicative of a larger planned operation, by rightwing factions of the IRGC/Basij, if the opportunity is presented.

Lyndon LaRouche observed that the threat of Israeli nuclear strikes against Iran is a factor driving Iran to seek its own nuclear deterrent. "It is all part of the continuing Sykes-Picot trap that hangs over the entire Southwest Asia region," LaRouche warned.

LaRouche emphasized that it is in the interests of the United States, Russia, China, India and all the neighboring states, for the threat of an Israeli attack to be removed. Iran, LaRouche emphasized, has every right to nuclear power, including to its own enrichment capability. But Iran should not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon. The best and only outcome, LaRouche emphasized, is for the Four Powers—the United States, Russia, China and India—to coordinate a diplomatic effort to secure an agreement with Iran to export their low enriched uranium, in exchange for higher enriched uranium rods, needed for their medical isotope reactor. Such an agreement, which is in the vital interests of everyone—except the British—must be rammed through now, LaRouche declared. The alternatives, including a possible Israeli strike against Iran, triggering permanent chaos throughout Eurasia, is unthinkable.

"We are facing an immediate threat of war, possibly nuclear war. Only a Four Powers concerted effort can prevent this. There is a nuclear threat against Iran coming from Israel," LaRouche continued. "Israel is acting as a Sykes-Picot puppet of London, and the Iranians know this. But we cannot allow this British-manipulated situation to continue. It would mean the destruction of India, the destruction of Pakistan, and chaos throughout the extended region, were the Israelis to be allowed to carry out an attack. We must prevent such an Israeli action, and we must prevent the present Iranian government from obtaining nuclear weapons. That can only be accomplished by a concerted effort by the Four Powers. Nothing short of that will trump the British game."

LaRouche addressed the Israeli situation. "If Israel is willing to go to war, under the direction of the British Monarchy, then they are placing themselves in the same British camp as Adolph Hitler and the Nazis, who were sponsored by London to launch their 1939 war against Poland. At the same time that Hitler was launching his war on Poland, on the same kind of pretext that some in Israel are now using to justify an attack on Iran, the Nazi dictator was also launching a so-called health care reform, called T-4, which was the original euthanasia program, that led to the Holocaust. Does anyone in Israel really wish to be in that camp? It is not irrelevant to this situation that the same Nazi T-4 healthcare 'reform' adopted by Hitler at the start of the invasion of Poland, was imposed on Great Britain by then-Prime Minister Tony Blair—and is now being pushed on the United States, through the Obama Administration. Tony Blair, who has the mysterious backing of factions within the Vatican, is aggressively pushing this policy down the throat of the Obama White House, with the enthusiastic backing of such White House figures as Rahm Emanuel and the London School of Economics' Peter Orszag."

LaRouche concluded: "Iran is a sovereign nation-state, and the Iranian people deserve the opportunity to sort out their situation, without the kind of threat of attack, currently coming from London via Israel. We must remove this factor from the political equation, through the only means available: A concerted intervention by the Four Powers, to secure an agreement from Iran on the nuclear fuel issue, that also guarantees that they will not be subject to a London-ordered attack from Israel. The alternative—a perpetual war in the heartland of Eurasia—is totally unacceptable, no matter how much the hysterics in the British Monarchy wish it to happen."

Skrár tengdar þessari bloggfærslu:

• The Problem Ain’t Dubai it's London